|
Printer
Friendly Version
The
rationale to incorporate cultural competence into
organizational policy are numerous. The National
Center for Cultural Competence has identified
six salient reasons for review:
- To
respond to current and projected demographic changes
in the United States.
The make-up of the American population is changing
as a result of immigration patterns and significant
increases among racially, ethnically, culturally
and linguistically diverse populations already residing
in the United States. Health care organizations
and programs, and federal, state and local governments
must implement systemic change in order to meet
the health needs of this diverse population.
Data from the 1990 census reveal that the number
of persons who speak a language other than English
at home rose by 43 percent to 28.3 million. Of these,
nearly 45 percent indicate they have trouble speaking
English.
The results of a March 1997 survey conducted by
the Census Bureau reveal that one in every ten persons
in the United States is foreign-born. Currently,
the US foreign-born population comprises a larger
segment than at any time in the past five decades.
This trend is expected to continue.
The Children's
Defense Fund predicts that early in the first
decade following the year 2000, there will be 5.5
million more Latino children, 2.6 million more African-American
children, 1.5 million more children of other races
and 6.2 million fewer white, non-Latino children
in the United States.
- To
eliminate long-standing disparities in the health
status of people of diverse racial, ethnic and cultural
backgrounds.
- Nowhere
are the divisions of race, ethnicity and culture
more sharply drawn than in the health of the people
in the United States. Despite recent progress
in overall national health, there are continuing
disparities in the incidence of illness and death
among African Americans, Latino/Hispanic Americans,
Native Americans, Asian Americans, Alaskan Natives
and Pacific Islanders as compared with the US
population as a whole. In recognition of these
continuing disparities, the President of the United
States has targeted six areas of health status
and committed resources to address cancer, cardiovascular
disease, infant mortality, diabetes, HIV/AIDS
and child and adult immunizations aggressively.
(See Health
Disparities Among Ethnic and Racial Groups.)
 |
|
Like
this article?
Sign
up for our newsletter that features
a new original article each month.
We
NEVER sell information. Privacy
Policy. See our Archives.
Unsubscribe
at ANY time.
|
|
| |
|
- To
improve the quality of services and health outcomes.
Despite similarities, fundamental differences among
people arise from nationality, ethnicity and culture,
as well as from family background and individual
experience. These differences affect the health
beliefs and behaviors of both patients and providers
have of each other.
The delivery of high-quality primary health care
that is accessible, effective and cost efficient
requires health care practitioners to have a deeper
understanding of the socio-cultural background of
patients, their families and the environments in
which they live. Culturally competent primary health
services facilitate clinical encounters with more
favorable outcomes, enhance the potential for a
more rewarding interpersonal experience and increase
the satisfaction the individual receiving health
care services.
Critical factors in the provision of culturally
competent health care services include understanding
of the:
- beliefs,
values, traditions and practices of a culture;
- culturally-defined,
health-related needs of individuals, families
and communities;
- culturally-based
belief systems of the etiology of illness and
disease and those related to health and healing;
and
- attitudes
toward seeking help from health care providers.
In making a diagnosis, health care providers must
understand the beliefs that shape a person's approach
to health and illness. Knowledge of customs and
healing traditions are indispensable to the design
of treatment and interventions. Health care services
must be received and accepted to be successful.
Increasingly, cultural knowledge and understanding
are important to personnel responsible for quality
assurance programs. In addition, those who design
evaluation methodologies for continual program improvement
must address hard questions about the relevance
of health care interventions. Cultural competence
will have to be inextricably linked to the definition
of specific health outcomes and to an ongoing system
of accountability that is committed to reducing
the current health disparities among racial, ethnic
and cultural populations.
- To
meet legislative, regulatory and accreditation mandates.
As both an enforcer of civil rights law and a major
purchaser of health care services, the Federal government
has a pivotal role in ensuring culturally competent
health care services. Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 mandates that no person in the United
States shall, on ground of race, color, or national
origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied
the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination
under any program or activity receiving Federal
financial assistance.
Organizations and programs have multiple, competing
responsibilities to comply with Federal, state and
local regulations for the delivery of health services.
The Bureau of Primary Health Care, in its Policy
Information Notice 98-23 (8/17/98), acknowledges
that: "Health centers serve culturally and
linguistically diverse communities and many serve
multiple cultures within one center. Although race
and ethnicity are often thought to be dominant elements
of culture, health centers should embrace a broader
definition to include language, gender, socioeconomic
status, housing status and regional differences.
Organizational behavior, practices, attitudes and
policies across all health center functions must
respect and respond to the cultural diversity of
communities and clients served. Health centers should
develop systems that ensure participation of the
diverse cultures in their community, including participation
of persons with limited English-speaking ability,
in programs offered by the health center. Health
centers should also hire culturally and linguistically
appropriate staff."
The Maternal and Child Health Bureau, through its
program efforts related to state accountability
and Healthy People Year 2000/2010 Objectives
includes an emphasis on cultural competency as an
integral component of health service delivery. The
National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Objectives emphasize cultural competence as
an integral component of the delivery of health
and nutrition services.
State and Federal agencies increasingly rely on
private accreditation entities to set standards
and monitor compliance with these standards. Both
the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of
Healthcare Organizations, which accredits hospitals
and other health care institutions, and the National
Committee for Quality Assurance, which accredits
managed care organizations and behavioral health
managed care organizations, support standards that
require cultural and linguistic competence in health
care.
- To
gain a competitive edge in the market place.
The provision of publicly financed health care services
is rapidly being delegated to the private sector.
Issues of concern in the current health care environment
include the marketing of health services and the
cost-effectiveness of health care delivery. The
potential for improved services lies in state managed-care
contracts that can increase retention and access
to care, expand recruitment and increase the satisfaction
of individuals seeking health care services.
To reach these outcomes, managed care plans must
incorporate culturally competent policies, structures
and practices to provide services for people from
diverse ethnic, racial, cultural and linguistic
backgrounds.
- To
decrease the likelihood of liability/malpractice
claims.
Lack of awareness about cultural differences may
result in liability under tort principles in several
ways. For example, providers may discover that they
are liable for damages as a result of treatment
in the absence of informed consent. Also,
health care organizations and programs face potential
claims that their failure to understand health beliefs,
practices and behavior on the part of providers
or patients breaches professional standards of care.
In some states, failure to follow instructions
because they conflict with values and beliefs may
raise a presumption of negligence on the part of
the provider.
The ability to communicate well with patients has
been shown to be effective in reducing the likelihood
of malpractice claims. A 1994 study appearing in
the journal of the American Medical Association
indicates that the patients of physicians who are
frequently sued had the most complaints about communication.
Physicians who had never been sued were likely to
be described as concerned, accessible and willing
to communicate. When physicians treat patients with
respect, listen to them, give them information and
keep communication lines open, therapeutic relationships
are enhanced and medical personnel reduce their
risk of being sued for malpractice.
Effective communication between providers and patients
may be even more challenging when there are cultural
and linguistic barriers. Health care organizations
and programs must address linguistic competence--insuring
for accurate communication of information in languages
other than English.
Contact
us to help you incorporate cultural competence in your
organization.
References used to prepare this document:
A Vision for America's Future: An Agenda for the 1990s."
(policy statement). Washington, D.C., Children's
Defense Fund (1990).
"Health Care Rx: Access For All." (chart book).
Washington, D.C., U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, 1998.
"Poor Communication With Patients Can Get You Sued."
Physicians Risk Management Update, vol. 4(1), Physicians
Insurance Exchange, 1995.
"The Initiative
To Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health."
(policy statement). Washington, D.C., U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, 1998.
The HIV/AIDS Epidemic in the United States, 1997-1998.
(fact sheet). Atlanta, GA., Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, 1998.
Cross, T., Bazron, B., Dennis, K., and Isaacs, M. "Towards
A Culturally Competent System of Care," vol.
1, Washington, D.C., National Technical Assistance Center
for Children's Mental Health, Georgetown University
Child Development Center, 1989.
Goode, T. "The Cultural Competence Continuum."
Training and Technical Assistance Resource Manual, (paper
presented at conference on Culturally Competent Services
and Systems: Implications for Children With Special Health
Needs). Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, 1998.
Like, R. "Treating and Managing the Care of Diverse
Patient Populations: Challenges for Training and Practice."
(paper presented at national conference on Quality Health
Care for Culturally Diverse Populations: Provider and
Community Collaboration in a Competitive Marketplace.)
New Brunswick, N.J., Center for Healthy Families and Cultural
Diversity, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 1998.
Mason, J. "Rationale for Cultural Competence in Health
and Human Services," Training and Technical Assistance
Resource Manual, (paper presented at national conference
on Culturally Competent Services and Systems: Implications
for Children With Special Health Needs.) Rio Grande, Puerto
Rico, 1998.
Source:
National Center for Cultural Competence
|